The secret is to shop for exactly what you need, based on
your retirement objective. I call these needs “decision
variables”, and the major ones are shown in the table along
with the retirement objectives to which they apply.
For example, the senior whose major objective is to increase
current and future income as much as possible will shop for
the largest monthly tenure payment, which is paid as long as
she resides in the house. If the senior has a concern about
the size of her estate, she will also look for the HECM that
results in the smallest future debt. Since it is unlikely
that the HECM that generates the largest tenure payment also
results in the smallest future debt, the senior has to
decide which variable has priority.
This example illustrates why the list of decision variables
does not include the interest rate and origination fee. A
higher interest rate results in a larger monthly tenure
payment, and also a larger future debt. Whether or not a
borrower finds a higher rate attractive or unattractive,
therefore, depends on which of the two decision variables
carries the greater weight.
Every one of the 10 retirement objectives shown in the table
has 2, and in some cases 3 decision variables. There is
nothing unusual or problematic about that, juggling
conflicting decision variables is what consumers do all the
time. When I bought my last car there were at least 8
decision variables that I considered, and my wife complained
that I gave greater weight to the quality of the sound
system than to the comfort of the rear seats.
The credit line is a uniquely valuable feature of a HECM
reverse mortgage, and figures prominently in the table of
retirement objectives and decision variables.